|
Double-Day
by Jeff Hagen
If You Think a 24-Hour Race is Tough, Try Two of
them in Tandem.
© 2001 42K(+) Press, Inc.
For those of you who have moved far beyond the marathon distance
to participate in 100-mile or 24-hour races, the journey to discover
your personal limits is not necessarily over. If you have been able
to sustain or even pick up the pace at the end of a day-long event,
you have probably wondered if you could have gone on for several
more hours. Does this sound like you? If so, a 48-hour race might
be your next step toward satisfying your curiosity about how many
miles you can accumulate in one event.
First a warning: a 48-hour race is far more than twice as difficult
as a 24-hour event. There's something about that second night on
the track or road that wreaks havoc on a runner's body and mind.
Mental toughness is essential for a successful 48-hour experience.
Now that you've been warned and are still interested, you probably
have some questions about doing a 48-hour event. Here are some common
ones:
# 1. How much training is necessary?
# 2. To sleep or not to sleep?
# 3. Are planned walking breaks optional?
# 4. What about pacing and split times?
# 5. What should I eat and drink during the race?
# 6. How do track courses compare with road courses?
# 7. What is it like running through the second night?
# 8. How much damage will the race do to my body?
How Much Training Is Necessary?
The training mileage you'll require to run a 48-hour race is basically
the same as you need for a 24-hour race. For elite runners, that
translates to 100 miles or more per week, while for some of us training
renegades it means no more than 20 to 25 miles per week. Increasing
training mileage beyond the 24-hour training level is probably futile,
as it's not possible to train the body to run 150 to 200+ miles
on reserves alone. Other factors, such as pacing and walking strategy,
play a much greater role in 48-hour races than they do in shorter
races.
It helps when training for a 48-hour event to do occasional workouts
on a bike path that has mile markers or on a track, to practice
your walk/run strategy for the race. This will accustom you to the
walking and running pace you intend to use during the race.
To Sleep or Not to Sleep?
Because the 48-hour race serves as the transition between single-day
and multiday running events, it's not surprising that the sleep
issue is prominent. Most runners trying to accumulate high mileage
during a 24-hour race attempt to run the event without significant
sleep. On the other hand, virtually all runners in a 72-hour race
take one or more major sleep breaks. Three days is just too long
for most people to go without sleep.
The 48-hour event lies at the center of the no sleep/must sleep
spectrum. Some runners try to run for two days without sleep, especially
if they're shooting for a record, but most runners choose to take
one or more naps ranging from 30 minutes to several hours. I have
done it both ways. In a November 1993 race at Gibson Ranch in Sacramento,
I took a 90-minute nap the first night, followed by a 10-minute
nap the second night on my way to a 213.75-mile performance. In
November of 1999 at the Texas A&M 48-Hour in College Station,
I took only a few 7- to 8-minute naps during the second night, en
route to a 216.41-mile total. Either way seems to work, but it's
a good idea not to schedule the sleep breaks rigidly. It's most
efficient to run until you can't keep your eyes open and then take
a nap. Decide ahead of time how long you intend to allow yourself
to sleep, and ask a crew person or bystander to wake you at the
right time. (If you plan to wake up on your own, you might snooze
your way through the remainder of the race and not wake up until
the middle of the awards ceremony.)
Are Planned Walking Breaks Optional?
Almost everyone needs to have a planned walking strategy for a
successful 48-hour race. Yes, some runners can complete a 24-hour
race without walking, but virtually no one tries to run 48 hours
straight (with a notable exception in Yiannis Kouros, the 48-hour
world record holder). Anyone who tries to run nonstop for two days
is likely to find that the second day is as pleasant as being staked
to an anthill for 24 hours.
The key word in any planned walking strategy is "planned."
It's terribly inefficient to walk only when you're too tired to
run, and doing so will lead to disappointment in a 48-hour race.
Planned walking means that the walking breaks need to be scheduled,
and it's important that you start them early in the event.
If you have had success with a walking strategy in 24-hour races,
use the same basic strategy in your 48-hour race but increase the
length or frequency of the walking breaks. A greater proportion
of walking is necessary to provide adequate rest for the 48-hour
event. For example, in a 24-hour race, I walk four minutes per mile,
starting at the second mile. In a 48-hour race I walk five or six
minutes per mile. For both events, I reduce or eliminate my walking
breaks near the end of the race, when I start my "finishing
kick."
At the Texas A&M 48-Hour in November 1999, I virtually eliminated
my walking breaks with seven hours left in the race. This was earlier
than normal to stop walking, but through mental math I had realized
that if I could run more than 35 miles in the last seven hours I
could break the North American men's 50 to 54 age-group record.
But there's no way I could have put forth that much effort at the
end of the race if I had not been walking at least five minutes
per mile for the first 41 hours.
Other 24-hour runners prefer a plan that calls for less walking,
such as running 25 minutes and walking 5 minutes. While this is
not nearly enough walking for me, many of the runners who use this
technique are national-class competitors who have had good results
with it. Converting this technique to the 48-hour venue might consist
of running 15 or 20 minutes and walking 5 minutes, or perhaps running
23 or 24 minutes and walking 6 or 7 minutes to maintain the convenient
30-minute total.
What About Pacing and Split Times?
As in any other race, two basic philosophies apply for pacing in
a 48-hour event. One is to start fast and try to hang on, while
the other is to start conservatively and then pour it on at the
end. It should come as no surprise that in a two-day race you should
strongly consider the conservative start. Starting too fast usually
results in a miserable second day, and there's a good chance that
you'll quit early.
What kind of splits should you shoot for? Ideally, the splits would
be even, but this rarely occurs. However, in the January 1993 Gibson
Ranch 48-Hour in Sacramento, Ron Kovacs ran identical 24-hour splits
of 101 miles for a total of 202 miles. In the same race, Jim Drake
ran 129 miles the first day and 84 miles the second day, as he set
a new North American men's 50 to 54 age-group record with a total
of 213 miles. In my 1999 Texas A&M race, I ran 112.9 miles the
first day and managed to cover 103.5 miles the second day as I pushed
hard to break Drake's North American record.
By sticking to a good walk/run strategy, the splits should take
care of themselves. But if it appears that you're heading for a
24-hour personal best during the first day of a 48-hour race, it
might be a good idea to back off on the pace to save something for
the second day.
What Should I Eat and Drink During The Race?
The longer the race, the more important eating and drinking become,
so it should surprise no one that proper intake of food and fluids
is critical in a two-day run. There might be a bit of good news
for runners who often have stomach problems in 50-mile and 100-mile
races. When I was in my 30s and early 40s, I used to boast of a
cast-iron stomach. But now that I am in my 50s, I routinely have
bouts of gastric distress about 50 miles into a 100-miler. However,
I have had no stomach problems during recent 48-hour races.
The ability to digest food seems to be closely related to running
pace. I have discovered that the slower pace of a 48-hour race enables
my body to assimilate fluids and process solid food more easily
than it does during the faster paces of shorter races. The key to
the slower pace is the long walking breaks. Walking allows the heart
rate to drop and, in turn, enables the body to shunt more blood
to the digestive system. Walking breaks are also a good time to
eat and drink because it's hard to literally eat on the run.
Most 48-hour aid stations offer much more than the standard "cookies,
bananas, and crackers" fare found at 50K and 50-mile races.
Having "real" food such as baked potatoes with butter
and sour cream, fried chicken, or pizza is a welcome treat at dinner
time, and I look forward to oatmeal in the morning to start the
second day right.
To this I add some favorite high-calorie snacks, such as milk shakes
or ice cream, to ensure that my body doesn't run short of fuel.
Whatever you decide to eat, if you tend to have stomach problems
when racing, eat small portions to avoid overloading your digestive
system.
Dehydration is a concern, as it is in other ultramarathons. However,
I have found that the slower pace makes it easier to absorb fluids
and maintain hydration levels. I used to think that a large part
of this was because most 48-hour races are held during the cooler
times of the year, but at the Texas A&M race a November heat
wave pushed daytime temperatures into the mid-80s. Carrying a bottle
of ice water in an insulated bottle carrier and drinking frequently
throughout the race, I was able to stay hydrated. To avoid electrolyte
depletion, it's a good idea to supplement your intake of water by
drinking an electrolyte solution periodically. Make sure the brand
used at the race agrees with you, or bring your own favorite brand
to the event.
How Do Track Courses Compare With Road Courses?
Two-day races are usually staged on a 400-meter track or on a longer
loop course. The latter are sometimes on roads and sometimes on
jogging trails in a park. Typically, these longer loops are approximately
a mile in length, give or take a half mile.
An advantage of track races is that they are more predictable,
because one rubberized track is essentially identical to another.
Minor variations may occur between tracks, such as access to rest
rooms, lighting, and exposure to the wind, but all are flat with
similar running surfaces and one aid station. Some runners might
add that all track races are monotonous, but others like the constant
access to crew, rest rooms, and aid station.
The main disadvantage of track races is the shortness of the laps,
which makes lap-counting tedious for both counters and runners.
Computerized lap counting, when available, is more runner-friendly.
The tight curves on a track can also be a problem because of the
torque placed on knees, ankles, and hips. Most 48-hour track races
provide periodic reversals in running direction to balance stresses
on the joints.
Forty-eight-hour road courses are usually more scenic, such as
the one-mile loop around a duck pond on the original Gibson Ranch
course in Sacramento. Another advantage of road or bike-path courses
is that the turns are usually more gentle than on a track. Disadvantages
include less-frequent access to aid and rest rooms, a road surface
that usually is more firm than is found on a rubberized track, and
the possibility of small hills that eventually seem like mountains.
Your walking strategy needs to be adjusted on road courses to compensate
for hills, wind direction, and changes in road surface. The ideal
place to walk would be uphill, against the wind, on the joint-busting
concrete sections of the course, but rarely do these three elements
coincide.
It's an advantage for a 48-hour course to be very simple, so runners
can follow the course "mindlessly" when their ability
to think begins to deteriorate. Sometimes, however, the courses
turn out to be very interesting and challenging. At the Texas A&M
48-Hour Race, the course consisted of three complicated loops in
a park, with a total distance of 1.547 miles. Part of the course
involved a concrete sidewalk, with occasional toe-stubbing ledges.
Another portion was a winding brick cobblestone path bordered by
mud on the first day, which dried into ordinary dirt by the second
day. Running the tangents would have involved going from brick to
mud to brick to mud, so most of us just stayed on the bricks, which
meant we ran more distance than we got credit for. A third section
of the course was a cross-country route over uneven ground, which
was tricky at night. Finally, there was a trail section, which had
been laid over an old pipeline of some sort. About every 10 feet
were two-inch-long metal rods sticking out of the ground in the
middle of the trail, apparently part of the joints in the old pipeline.
There were also some hills on the course—not big ones, but
they "grew" as the race went on. This was a course on
which I had to pay constant attention to avoid going off course
or tripping on an obstacle.
Choosing between track and road courses is almost a moot issue.
There is little room for runners to be picky because only a handful
of 48-hour events are offered each year in the United States. If
you want to try a 48-hour event, just select one that is convenient
for you. Either type of course has advantages and can provide a
very interesting race.
What Is It Like Running Through the Second Night?
Almost everyone I've talked to who has run a 48-hour race stresses
the trials of the infamous "second night." That's when
a runner's brain can turn to mush, and self-doubt and hallucinations
become common.
In the January 1993 Gibson Ranch race, both Jim Drake and I could
have sworn that trees and stop signs were chasing us. The course
lights created shadows that appeared to move as we ran, but at that
point in the event, we were so tired that it seemed real. The Texas
A&M race provided special challenges. To fit this on-campus
race into a weekend in the middle of a semester, the race director
started the race at 7 o'clock on Friday night and ended it at 7
o'clock on Sunday night. Because it was November, it had been dark
for an hour when the race started. Although streetlights illuminated
parts of the course, the cross-country section was quite dark, so
I carried a flashlight for the first 50 or 60 miles.
The second night was easier than usual, perhaps because it began
only 23 hours into the race. The big challenge came at the 47-hour
point, when darkness enveloped us for the third time in the event.
During the last hour of the race I was running very hard, but it
was difficult because my eyes refused to focus properly. Part of
the problem might have been the inner-ear condition I've had for
the past 8 years, which has affected my balance. Whatever the cause,
not only the trees but the ground itself seemed to be moving. On
the cross-country portion I tried carrying a flashlight, but this
created even more moving shadows, so I finished the race running
the uneven terrain in the dark, essentially from memory.
If you find that trees are "chasing" you in a 48-hour
race, this might be an excellent time to take a nap. A short snooze
could be all you need to bring you back to the world of the living.
On the other hand, some runners might say that being chased by stop
signs is cool and choose to enjoy their altered state of mind until
it disappears with the next sunrise.
How Much Damage Will the Race Do to My Body?
Make no mistake about it: a 48-hour race is a grueling event that
should not be taken lightly. If you do everything right and are
lucky, you might be able to walk to your car after the event, but
it will be painful. By way of comparison, a maximal 48-hour effort
makes a 24-hour event seem like a walk in the park. The 48-hour
event could even be considered a type of medical test for determining
the weakest parts of your body because during or after the race
these weak spots are likely to make themselves known.
My weak spot happens to be my left eye. Twenty years ago I contracted
a bad viral eye infection. Since then it has recurred only twice:
once the week after the November 1993 Gibson Ranch 48-Hour and once
a couple of days after the 1998 Across-the-Years race in Phoenix.
The last episode resulted in corneal scarring in my left eye, with
permanent vision loss. An ophthalmologist determined that I have
inadequate tear production in my eyes and running for 48 hours in
cold, dry air apparently had dried my eyes enough to allow the virus
to reactivate. Now I apply eye drops frequently when I run ultras,
and I've had no recurrences.
At the very least, running a 48-hour race will diminish your immune
response and make you susceptible to infections for several weeks
after the race. My inner-ear problem has had a major impact on my
life due to unpredictable episodes of severe dizziness and significant
hearing loss in one ear. The condition first appeared when a virus
settled in my inner ear a few days after the 1991 Gibson Ranch 48-Hour.
I had run the race before recovering completely from a cold, which
was unwise, and I'll be paying for this mistake for the rest of
my life.
Adequate rest after a 48-hour effort cannot be stressed too much.
Take a few days off work and just relax. I failed to heed this advice,
and I picked up those infections. Also, your sleep pattern might
be disturbed after running for two nights, so a few days off lets
you rest when you need to. In any case, don't even think about running
for at least a week while you're recovering. Even if your legs don't
hurt, they probably will feel "dead" for weeks or even
months. In 1998, I ran five 24-hour races and one 100-mile trail
race in a period of six months, with no adverse effects, but the
extreme effort I expended at the Texas A&M 48-Hour last November
left my legs feeling sluggish for more than six months. It seems
prudent to avoid entering any significant races until you feel fully
recovered from your 48-hour race.
Summary
A 48-hour race is a fascinating and demanding event that determines
your physical limits in a way that shorter events can't. It is also
a good way to test the ability of your mind to function under extreme
stress.
If you don't have an abundance of natural speed but feel strong
at the end of 24-hour events, an event of twice that length might
be your race. The only way to know for sure is to find the nearest
48-hour race and sign up. But be aware of the hazards involved in
a race of this duration, and prepare to allow for adequate recovery
time after your effort. And for those of you who find that a 48-hour
run is an insufficient challenge, you can always sign up for a six-day
race to test your mettle.
This article originally appeared in the May/June 2001 issue
of Marathon & Beyond. For information about reprinting or excerpting
this article or any other M & B article, contact Jan Seeley
via email or at 217-359-9345. This article can be found at http://www.marathonandbeyond.com/
|